Economic
| G3 Indicator | PotashCorp’s Economic Performance in 2009 |
|---|---|
| Economic Performance | |
| EC1. Direct economic value generated and distributed. |
In 2009, we generated the third-highest economic value as defined by GRI in our history despite a 65 percent decrease in year-over-year potash sales volumes. Dramatic reductions in tonnes of potash sold occurred in both North American (-63 percent) and offshore (-66 percent) markets. Realized prices held considerably better for potash than for phosphate (-50 percent) and nitrogen (-48 percent): Potash net sales prices were up 5 percent in North America, while offshore prices declined 18 percent. Economic value distributed has increased by 41 percent since 2005. Economic Value Distributed — Overview Short-term market conditions combined with increased spending on potash expansions led to more value being distributed than generated in 2009. Year-over-year value generated decreased by 59 percent, due mostly to sales decreases in all segments. Value distributed also decreased, but by a smaller magnitude, 36 percent. While negative economic value retained is unsustainable in the long term, in the short term it reflects our commitment to our Potash First strategy (expanding our potash production capacities) and our confidence in this segment to generate significant value in the future. |
| EC2. Financial implications and organizational risks and opportunities of climate change. |
Climate change risks and opportunities are discussed in the GHG section. |
| EC3. Coverage of the organization’s defined benefit plan obligation. |
PotashCorp provides retirement income and other post-retirement benefits for most employees. Retirement benefits help attract and retain a dedicated workforce and support long-term financial planning for our employees and labor stability for the company. The investment portfolios for our defined benefit pension plans include equity and fixed income investments but do not include private equity, real estate or hedge fund holdings. Asset Allocations of PotashCorp’s Significant Defined Benefit Pension Plans |
| EC4. Significant financial assistance received from government. |
PotashCorp received no financial assistance from any level of government in 2009. |
| Market Presence | |
| EC5. Entry level wage compared to local minimum wage for significant locations of operation. |
To attract and retain employees, PotashCorp offers fair and competitive wages. In all jurisdictions where we operate, our lowest entry-level wages are significantly higher than the local minimum wage. In 2009, our Board of Directors agreed to an exemption under our Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP), allowing employees at our plant sites to be eligible for bonus payments based on site-specific safety and environmental performance, even though the company did not reach the required economic targets. We permanently raised the recognition factor for individual performance for non-hourly employees to plus or minus 30 percent of the award calculation. For the 2009 award year, this was increased from plus or minus 20 percent. |
| EC6. Policy, practices and proportion of spending on locally-based suppliers at significant locations of operation. |
PotashCorp local purchasing was 62 percent in 2009, exceeding our 60 percent target. |
| EC7. Procedures for local hiring, and proportion of senior management hired from the local community in locations of significant operation. |
We typically hire local residents for our positions. Most employees reside in communities near our facilities. |
| Indirect Economic Impacts | |
| EC8. Development and impact of infrastructure investments and services provided primarily for public benefit through commercial, in-kind or pro bono engagement. |
According to an impact study completed by SJ Research Services in 2008, PotashCorp expansion projects at our Rocanville, Allan, Lanigan, Cory and Patience Lake potash operations are expected to:
|
| EC9. Indirect economic impacts. |
Through wages, hiring and local purchasing policies, PotashCorp has an economic impact on local labor markets. |





